It’s a Story.
Part One of the three-part series: It’s a Story. It’s ALWAYS a Story. It’s Always YOUR Story.
More than 50 slides. My first executive-level briefing. One question that permanently changed how I thought about presenting.
Humans make sense of complexity through story. We use narrative to connect events, establish what matters, and understand how one thing led to another.
Yet many business presentations abandon narrative almost entirely. They become collections of information: densely written slides, long lists of facts, and presenters reading aloud what the audience has already received as a pre-read.
The information may all be accurate. The problem is that no one is helping the audience understand the relationship among the pieces or the meaning they are meant to carry away.
I learned this during my first executive-level briefing.
I was supporting a federal counterpart who was presenting to a senior federal appointee. My role was to answer questions if the conversation moved into the technical details of the project I was leading.
My counterpart arrived with more than 50 slides. Every detail had been documented: extensive text, very few images, and almost no white space. At the time, I assumed this was what an executive briefing was supposed to look like. If every possible detail appeared somewhere in the deck, we would be prepared for anything.
The Administrator had already received the material. But when the presentation began, my counterpart started reading each bullet word for word.
After about ten minutes, she stopped him with: “Are you going to read every bullet on every slide in the deck?”
I stayed composed, but the lesson landed immediately:
The slides are not the story. They support the story.
A presentation is not information transferred from one person to another. It is an act of translation. The presenter must help an audience understand what is happening, why it matters, how the pieces connect, and what the situation now requires.
That work cannot be delegated to the slides.
Once I understood this, the way I approached presentations changed. I stopped beginning with the question, What information should go into the deck? I began with different questions:
What does this audience need to understand?
What tension or decision is bringing us into the room?
What sequence will help them see how we arrived here?
Which details carry the argument and which belong in supporting material?
This does not mean simplifying a complex situation until its substance disappears. Nor does it mean withholding evidence that complicates the preferred conclusion. It means giving the information an intelligible structure so the audience can follow the reasoning without being buried by it.
The deck then becomes what it should be: a visual and evidentiary companion to the conversation. It can orient the audience, make patterns visible, and preserve important details. But it should not replace the person presenting.
Your value in the room is not that you can recite the contents of the slides. It is that you understand the relationships among the facts, the context surrounding them, and the consequences of what is being proposed.
That understanding is what allows you to remain present rather than memorized. You know where the story is going, so you can adjust how you tell it without losing the thread.
A strong presentation works across several forms at once. The audience hears the narrative, sees the structure, and encounters the evidence that supports it. Each form reinforces the others.
But the slides do not own the story.
You do.



Comments